STATEMENT-1: A cloth covers a table. Some dis | vedclass

Name: Exam Paper Generator | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

Question

(B) $Statement-1$ is True because of the property of inertia. When the cloth is pulled out very quickly,the time interval for the force to act on the

Vedclass · Accepted Answer

$Statement-1$ is True,$Statement-2$ is True; $Statement-2$ is $NOT$ a correct explanation for $Statement-1$.

Vedclass · Answer

(B) $Statement-1$ is True because of the property of inertia. When the cloth is pulled out very quickly,the time interval for the force to act on the dishes is extremely small. Due to the inertia of rest,the dishes tend to remain in their position.$Statement-2$ is a fundamental law of motion (Newton's Third Law),which is also True. However,the phenomenon of pulling the cloth without moving the dishes is explained by Newton's First Law (Inertia),not the Third Law.Therefore,$Statement-2$ is not the correct explanation for $Statement-1$.

$STATEMENT-1$: $A$ cloth covers a table. Some dishes are kept on it. The cloth can be pulled out without dislodging the dishes from the table. Because
$STATEMENT-2$: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Similar Questions

Which of the following persons is in an inertial frame of reference?

Due to which property of an object does it resist any attempt to change its state of motion?

Is it possible for a body to have inertia but no weight?

What was the mistake in Aristotle's idea regarding motion?

$A$ reference frame attached to the Earth cannot be an inertial frame because

Vedclass Test Series

Exam Paper Generator

Online Exam Module

$STATEMENT-1$: $A$ cloth covers a table. Some dishes are kept on it. The cloth can be pulled out without dislodging the dishes from the table. Because$STATEMENT-2$: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.