(C) The Assertion is correct because if two equipotential surfaces were to intersect,the point of intersection would have two different values of elec

Name: Exam Paper Generator | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

If Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.

(C) The Assertion is correct because if two equipotential surfaces were to intersect,the point of intersection would have two different values of electric potential,which is physically impossible.The Reason is incorrect because equipotential surfaces are not necessarily parallel to each other. For example,for a point charge,the equipotential surfaces are concentric spheres,and for a line charge,they are coaxial cylinders. They can have any shape depending on the charge distribution.

Class 12 Physics Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance Equipotential Surface

Easy

Assertion: Two equipotential surfaces cannot cut each other.
Reason: Two equipotential surfaces are parallel to each other.

AIIMS 2011 All AIIMS

A
If both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
B
If both Assertion and Reason are correct,but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
C
If Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
D
If both the Assertion and Reason are incorrect.

Explore More

Browse All

Question Bank

All Subjects

Class 12 Questions

Class 12

Physics Questions

Chapter

Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance

Subtopic

Equipotential Surface

Previous Year

AIIMS 2011 Paper All AIIMS years →

Equipotential surfaces associated with an electric field which is increasing in magnitude along the $x$-direction are

MediumAIIMS 2004

View Solution

$A$ square of side $a$ has a charge $Q$ at its centre. $A$ charge $q$ is placed at one of the corners. The work required to be done in moving the charge $q$ from this corner to the diagonally opposite corner is

Easy

View Solution

$A$ uniform electric field is prevailing in the $X$-direction in a certain region. The coordinates of points $P$,$Q$,and $R$ are $(0,0)$,$(2,0)$,and $(0,2)$ respectively. Which of the following alternatives is true for the potentials at these points?

EasyGUJCET 2017

View Solution

$A$ hollow conducting sphere is placed in an electric field produced by a point charge placed at $P$ as shown in the figure. Let $V_A, V_B, V_C$ be the potentials at points $A, B,$ and $C$ respectively. Then:

Easy

View Solution

The figure shows a family of parallel equipotential surfaces and four paths along which an electron is made to move from one surface to another.
$(I)$ What is the direction of the electric field?
$(II)$ Rank the paths according to the magnitude of work done, greatest first.

Difficult

View Solution

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free

For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo

Assertion: Two equipotential surfaces cannot cut each other.Reason: Two equipotential surfaces are parallel to each other.

Similar Questions

Equipotential surfaces associated with an electric field which is increasing in magnitude along the $x$-direction are

$A$ square of side $a$ has a charge $Q$ at its centre. $A$ charge $q$ is placed at one of the corners. The work required to be done in moving the charge $q$ from this corner to the diagonally opposite corner is

$A$ uniform electric field is prevailing in the $X$-direction in a certain region. The coordinates of points $P$,$Q$,and $R$ are $(0,0)$,$(2,0)$,and $(0,2)$ respectively. Which of the following alternatives is true for the potentials at these points?

$A$ hollow conducting sphere is placed in an electric field produced by a point charge placed at $P$ as shown in the figure. Let $V_A, V_B, V_C$ be the potentials at points $A, B,$ and $C$ respectively. Then:

The figure shows a family of parallel equipotential surfaces and four paths along which an electron is made to move from one surface to another. $(I)$ What is the direction of the electric field?$(II)$ Rank the paths according to the magnitude of work done, greatest first.

Vedclass Test Series

Exam Paper Generator

Online Exam Module

Assertion: Two equipotential surfaces cannot cut each other.
Reason: Two equipotential surfaces are parallel to each other.

The figure shows a family of parallel equipotential surfaces and four paths along which an electron is made to move from one surface to another.
$(I)$ What is the direction of the electric field?
$(II)$ Rank the paths according to the magnitude of work done, greatest first.