Let R be a relation defined on the set Z of a | vedclass

Name: Exam Paper Generator | JEE NEET Paper Generator | Vedclass
Brand: Vedclass
Rating: 5 (35 reviews)

Question

(C) Reflexivity: For $x \in Z$, we check if $(x, x) \in R$. $x + 2x = 3x$, which is clearly divisible by $3$. Thus, $xRx$ holds for all $x \in Z$, so

Vedclass · Accepted Answer

$R$ is an equivalence relation

Vedclass · Answer

(C) Reflexivity: For $x \in Z$, we check if $(x, x) \in R$. $x + 2x = 3x$, which is clearly divisible by $3$. Thus, $xRx$ holds for all $x \in Z$, so $R$ is reflexive. Symmetry: Let $(x, y) \in R$, which means $x + 2y = 3\lambda$ for some integer $\lambda$. Then $x = 3\lambda - 2y$. We check $y + 2x$: $y + 2x = y + 2(3\lambda - 2y) = y + 6\lambda - 4y = 6\lambda - 3y = 3(2\lambda - y)$. Since $3(2\lambda - y)$ is divisible by $3$, $(y, x) \in R$. Thus, $R$ is symmetric. Transitivity: Let $(x, y) \in R$ and $(y, z) \in R$. Then $x + 2y = 3\lambda$ and $y + 2z = 3\mu$ for some integers $\lambda, \mu$. Adding these: $(x + 2y) + (y + 2z) = 3\lambda + 3\mu \Rightarrow x + 3y + 2z = 3(\lambda + \mu)$. $x + 2z = 3(\lambda + \mu) - 3y = 3(\lambda + \mu - y)$. Since $x + 2z$ is divisible by $3$, $(x, z) \in R$. Thus, $R$ is transitive. Conclusion: Since $R$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation.

Let $R$ be a relation defined on the set $Z$ of all integers such that $x R y$ if and only if $x+2y$ is divisible by $3$. Then:

Similar Questions

Let $N$ be the set of natural numbers greater than $100$. Define the relation $R$ on $N$ by: $R = \{(x, y) \in N \times N : \text{the numbers } x \text{ and } y \text{ have at least two common divisors}\}.$ Then $R$ is-

The number of relations on the set $A = \{1, 2, 3\}$ containing at most $6$ elements including $(1, 2)$,which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric,is . . . . . . .

Let $A = \{p, q, r\}$. Which of the following is $NOT$ an equivalence relation on $A$?

Let $R$ be a relation from $N$ to $N$ defined by $R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in N \text{ and } a = b^2\}$. Is the following statement true?
$(a, a) \in R$,for all $a \in N$

Let $R = \{(1,2), (2,3), (3,3)\}$ be a relation defined on the set $A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}$. Then the minimum number of elements needed to be added to $R$ so that $R$ becomes an equivalence relation is:

Vedclass Test Series

Exam Paper Generator

Online Exam Module