Why can wave theory not explain the change in the kinetic energy of an electron with a change in the frequency of incident light?

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) According to the wave theory of light,the energy of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude (intensity) and is independent of its frequency.
$1$. Wave theory suggests that the energy delivered to the metal surface depends on the intensity of the light,not its frequency.
$2$. Therefore,if the intensity is kept constant,the wave theory predicts that the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons should remain constant regardless of the frequency of the incident light.
$3$. However,experimental observations show that the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons increases linearly with the frequency of incident light.
$4$. This discrepancy arises because light interacts with matter as discrete packets of energy called photons,where the energy of each photon is given by $E = h\nu$. Since the wave theory treats light as a continuous wave,it fails to account for this frequency-dependent energy transfer.

Explore More

Similar Questions

What is zero-point energy or Fermi energy?

Difficult
View Solution

If the electron in a hydrogen atom jumps from the third Bohr orbit to the ground state directly and the difference between the energies of the two states is radiated in the form of photons. If the work function of the material is $4.1 \text{ eV}$, then the stopping potential is nearly:
$\left[\text{Energy of electron in } n^{\text{th}} \text{ orbit} = \frac{-13.6}{n^2} \text{ eV}\right]$ (in $\text{ V}$)

When a photon of light collides with a metal surface, the number of electrons (if any) coming out is:

If two metals $A$ and $B$ are exposed to radiation of wavelength $350 \, nm$. The work functions of metals $A$ and $B$ are $4.8 \, eV$ and $2.2 \, eV$ respectively. Choose the correct option.

In a photocell circuit,the stopping potential $V_0$ is a measure of the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons. The following graph shows experimentally measured values of stopping potential versus frequency $\nu$ of incident light. The values of Planck's constant and the work function as determined from the graph are (taking the magnitude of electronic charge to be $e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, C$):

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo