Recall the experiments done by Frederick Griffith,Avery,MacLeod,and McCarty,where $DNA$ was speculated to be the genetic material. If $RNA$,instead of $DNA$,was the genetic material,would the heat-killed strain of $Pneumococcus$ have transformed the $R$-strain into a virulent strain? Explain.

Vedclass pdf generator app on play store
Vedclass iOS app on app store
(N/A) $RNA$ is chemically more labile and prone to degradation compared to $DNA$ due to the presence of the $2'-OH$ group in its ribose sugar.
Furthermore,$RNA$ is highly susceptible to enzymatic degradation by ribonucleases,which are ubiquitous in the environment.
Therefore,if $RNA$ were the genetic material,the heat-killed $S$-strain would likely have been degraded during the experimental process and would not have retained its ability to transform the $R$-strain into a virulent form.

Explore More

Similar Questions

The Hershey and Chase experiment is given below. What are the processes $P, Q,$ and $R$?
$\quad\quad \quad P \quad\quad\quad Q \quad \quad\quad R$

Which scientist experimentally proved that $DNA$ is the sole genetic material in bacteriophage?

What was the transforming principle identified by Avery,MacLeod,and McCarty in Pneumococcus?

How did Hershey and Chase differentiate between $DNA$ and protein in their experiment while proving that $DNA$ is the genetic material?

Bacteriophage transfers $DNA$ from a donor to a recipient cell; this process is called:

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo