Let $p$ be the statement '$x$ is an irrational number',$q$ be the statement '$y$ is a transcendental number',and $r$ be the statement '$x$ is a rational number or $y$ is a transcendental number'.
Statement-$1$: $r$ is equivalent to $q \lor p$.
Statement-$2$: $r$ is equivalent to $(p \Leftrightarrow \sim q)$.

  • A
    Statement-$1$ is false. Statement-$2$ is true.
  • B
    Statement-$1$ is true. Statement-$2$ is false.
  • C
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true. Statement-$2$ is the correct explanation for Statement-$1$.
  • D
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true. Statement-$2$ is not the correct explanation for Statement-$1$.

Explore More

Similar Questions

$\sim (p \Leftrightarrow q)$ is

Which of the following is not a statement?

If $\sim p \to q$ is false and $q \leftrightarrow r$ is false, then the truth value of $(p, q, r)$ is...

Given the following two statements:
$(S_{1}): (q \vee p) \rightarrow (p \leftrightarrow \sim q)$ is a tautology.
$(S_{2}): \sim q \wedge (\sim p \leftrightarrow q)$ is a fallacy.
Then:

The negation of the inverse of $\sim p \rightarrow q$ is

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo